PHARMATRAIN News Contact

Eu2P

Key Roles and Stakeholders in Medicines Risk Communication: Duties and Challenges

Practical Information

Commencing Date:
Anytime
Language:
(Afan)/Oromoor/Oriya
Location:
World Wide (Distance Learning)


Teaching Methodology:
Distance Learning
Credits :
Short courses (CPD): 3 ECTS credits


European Fees:
3000 EUR
Scholarship Possibilities:
No

Course Contact

Eu2P Office

+ (33) 5 57 57 92 57

contact@eu2p.org


Website

Office Link

Eu2P

University Accreditation: Yes

PharmaTrain Centre

Description

This module will address in more depth the challenges (rationale , emotional and logistical) of Risk communication that have been raised in previous modules Objectives To consider the evolution and social impact of the concept of risk and benefit risk To explore the understanding of risk perception and uncertainty To consider challenges in healthcare providers-patients communication To know the regulatory agencies strategies to address the challenges of risk communication Topics covered: Historical perspective. Evolution of concept of risk communication. Social impact of drug risk communication Risk perception. Actual vs perceived and factors influencing perception. Population vs individual risk perception Concept of uncertainty. How to deal with this in risk communication Nature and importance of communication of risk of medicines: accessibility of data, conflict of interest and independent information Regulatory agencies' strategies to address the challenges of risk communication

IMI Standards

  • A predefined set of teaching objectives, leading to defined learning outcomes
  • Assessment of the students' achievement in accordance with the agreed learning outcomes of the training offered
  • A system for collecting, assessing and addressing feedback from learners, teachers, technical / administrative staff and programme / course / module managers
  • Availability of appropriate and regularly reviewed reference material (e.g. published articles, links, book chapters, scripts, etc)
  • Defined and transparent admission criteria
  • Quality assurance of teaching staff
  • Regular review of the QA/QC process and demonstration that the training is further developed in light of this review
  • The facilities, infrastructure, leadership and competences available for the support of student learning
  • University accreditation OR a system for approving, monitoring and reviewing the training offered